The Department of Education (DepEd) has released the Interim Guidelines for the Performance Management and Evaluation System (PMES) for teachers in the School Year (SY) 2024-2025. These guidelines aim to improve the teacher evaluation process by making it more structured, transparent, and aligned with the Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST).

This article will explain the key points of the DepEd PMES guidelines, including teacher performance evaluation, observation schedules, rating computation, and submission requirements.

What is the DepEd PMES?

The Performance Management and Evaluation System (PMES) is a tool used by DepEd to assess the performance of public school teachers. It replaces the previous Results-Based Performance Management System (RPMS) and ensures that teacher evaluations are based on clear, fair, and measurable standards.

PMES Cycle for Teachers

The teacher performance cycle follows four phases:

1. Performance Planning and Commitment
   • Discussion of target objectives at the start of the 4th Quarter
   • Teachers (ratees) and their observers (raters) agree on evaluation goals
2. Performance Monitoring and Coaching
   • Classroom observations (1 or 2 full-period observations)
   • Coaching and mentoring sessions to help teachers improve
3. Performance Review and Evaluation
   • Final rating of teachers after all evaluations are completed
   • Ratings are reviewed by approving authorities
4. Performance Rewarding and Development Planning
   • Teachers receive feedback and create an Individual Development Plan (IDP)

Teacher Evaluation Process: How It Works

1. Classroom Observations

Teachers will have one or two full-period classroom observations during the 4th quarter. There are two scheduling options:

• Option A: Two observations covering different objectives
• Option B: One observation covering all objectives

Observers (raters) will assess teaching strategies, student engagement, and instructional methods based on the PPST indicators.

2. Non-Classroom Observable Objectives (NCOI)

Teachers must also demonstrate professional development efforts, such as:

• Attending mentoring and coaching sessions
• Participating in school-based programs
• Collaborating with colleagues and stakeholders

3. Rating Computation

Teachers will be rated based on Quality and Efficiency:

• Quality: Based on classroom performance and lesson effectiveness
• Efficiency: Based on timely completion of objectives

The final rating follows a 5-point scale, ranging from Outstanding (5) to Poor (1).

Submission of Teacher Evaluation Reports

1. Electronic IPCRF Submission

Teachers must submit their electronic Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (e-IPCRF) through DepEd’s online system after the performance evaluation.

• Deadline: End of the 4th quarter to the first month of the next school year
• Submission Method: Only through official DepEd email accounts

2. Required Forms and Documents

Teachers and raters must use the following official DepEd tools:

• PMES Tools for Proficient and Highly Proficient Teachers
• Classroom Observation Tool (COT)
• Inter-Observer Agreement Form
• Electronic IPCRF Form

All documents should be uploaded to DepEd’s system for final evaluation.

Key Takeaways for Teachers

• New evaluation system: PMES replaces RPMS for SY 2024-2025.
• Classroom observations: 1-2 full-period observations in the 4th quarter.
• Performance rating: Based on Quality and Efficiency.
• Electronic submission: All evaluations must be uploaded via DepEd’s online system.
• Support and mentoring: Teachers receive coaching and feedback for improvement.

The DepEd PMES 2024-2025 aims to make teacher evaluations fair, transparent, and aligned with the PPST. By following these guidelines, teachers can track their progress, receive constructive feedback, and enhance their teaching skills.

For more details, teachers should refer to DepEd’s official memorandum.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)