Public School Sports Meet: Is Winning the Only Goal?
A netizen recently went viral after expressing frustration about how some public schools handle sports meets. The post criticized school heads who stop students from joining competitions simply because they are “not winnable.”
According to the netizen, this mindset is unfair to students who train hard but are not given the chance to compete.
“Why stop kids from joining just because they might not win? How can they improve if they are not allowed to play?” the netizen wrote.


Sports Meets Should Be for Skill Development, Not Just Winning
The netizen reminded everyone that the real purpose of public school sports meets is to develop students’ skills and confidence. Competitions are supposed to help students grow, learn teamwork, and gain experience—not just to bring home medals.
“The meet is for the kids. It’s where they can dream big and learn. Even if they lose now, they might become better players in the future,” the post said.
The Budget Excuse Is Not Acceptable
Some schools argue that there is no budget to send students to sports meets. But the netizen disagreed, saying that there is funding available for these events.
“Budget is not the real reason. The problem is the mindset. They only want to join if the students are sure to win,” the netizen added.
This attitude, according to the post, kills the dreams of many young athletes who simply want to experience playing in a real competition.
Netizen Reacts to Negative Comments
The viral post also received negative reactions, with some people saying the netizen was overreacting or being unfair. But the netizen stood firm, saying the message was only for the benefit of the students.
“If you don’t want to be called out, then give the kids a chance. This is for them, not for anyone’s pride,” the netizen said in a follow-up post.
Why This Issue Matters
Sports are not just about winning medals. They teach valuable lessons like discipline, teamwork, and perseverance. If public schools only focus on sending “winnable” players, many kids will lose the chance to develop their talents.
The netizen’s post reminds us that every student deserves the chance to play, learn, and grow—whether they win or lose.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
What is the real purpose of public school sports meets?
The main purpose is to help students develop skills, gain experience, and build confidence—not just to win.
Why do some schools only send strong players?
Some schools focus too much on winning and believe sending only strong players ensures medals.
Should beginners be allowed to join?
Yes, because they can only improve by joining actual competitions.
Is budget really a problem?
The netizen claims there is enough budget, so it should not be an excuse to stop students from joining.
Do you agree with this netizen? Should public schools let all students join sports meets, even if they might lose? Comment your thoughts!